What best describes the difference between visible hazards and latent hazards?

What best describes the difference between visible hazards and latent hazards?

• A. Both are equally obvious; no difference
• B. Visible hazards are apparent at a glance; latent hazards exist but are not immediately obvious and require inspection to identify
• C. Visible hazards require permits to address
• D. Latent hazards are obvious; visible hazards require inspection

Answer: (B)

Visible hazards show up right away to the eye—things like a spill, broken equipment, or exposed wires that you can spot at a glance. Latent hazards, on the other hand, exist but aren’t immediately obvious; you need inspection, testing, or monitoring to uncover them, such as structural weaknesses behind walls, hidden electrical faults, or mold growth. That distinction matters because safety relies on both recognizing obvious dangers immediately and using regular checks to find hidden risks before they cause harm. The other statements mix up what visibility means or bring in unrelated ideas like permits, which aren’t part of how visibility is defined.

Visible hazards show up right away to the eye—things like a spill, broken equipment, or exposed wires that you can spot at a glance. Latent hazards, on the other hand, exist but aren’t immediately obvious; you need inspection, testing, or monitoring to uncover them, such as structural weaknesses behind walls, hidden electrical faults, or mold growth. That distinction matters because safety relies on both recognizing obvious dangers immediately and using regular checks to find hidden risks before they cause harm. The other statements mix up what visibility means or bring in unrelated ideas like permits, which aren’t part of how visibility is defined.